InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 690
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/09/2017

Re: None

Saturday, 10/05/2019 3:50:54 PM

Saturday, October 05, 2019 3:50:54 PM

Post# of 23274
Suddenly lots of posts to read at once here. I will combine my thoughts and questions on multiple topics.

1. Ken Starr and the legit law firm. It definitely surprised me to see this famous name on the side of PTSC. I had assumed they were represented by someone whose face appears on a bus stop bench. The question is does this represent a belief on their part that PTSC can prevail (like is there any contingency built into the fee structure), or are they just collecting a paycheck.
2. The composition of the supreme court. I'm not convinced that this is an issue that would divide along liberal/conservative lines. The only argument I've heard seems to be that tech is liberal, so the liberal judges are in their back pocket. Even if you are that cynical, let's at least consider that this is about hardware, not social media. And even there you have Elizabeth Warren out there saying big tech should be broken up. Regardless, the question put to them is some broad principle, not whether PTSC should get millions of dollars. Who else would be affected by a positive ruling?
3. Back in better times, PTSC was collecting $$ for use of their patents. I vaguely recall Intel paying $5 million. Are companies that already paid completely off the hook regardless of any ruling? I.e., is this just to try to collect from the ones who didn't pay up before?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CPMV News