Hi Buddy,
Listen, I have a question.
I've read your neverending discussions with Krombacher, question:
Can you add some value to the discussions by being constructive for once?
Ok: I'm pondering as to why on earth those (probably hugely expensive) lawsuits are being carried on by ERHC?
How can you fit those lawsuits in your general (pretty negative) point of view, if everything you claim and radiate is true?
If you can answer that question in a realistic, common sense, manner, we maybe could get closer as to what is going on behind the scenes of this little company, that should normally already have declared bankruptcy a long time ago (right?), but still hasn't…
Do you reckon that the entity behind the funding of these lawsuits, at least has a (serious) financial interest in keeping ERHC alive?
Ok, let's discuss this in a constructive manner please.
tia.
The Doc.
