InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 347
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/29/2016

Re: RandyKCMO post# 456

Friday, 10/04/2019 4:19:43 PM

Friday, October 04, 2019 4:19:43 PM

Post# of 927
0.0161 ? 0.0 (0.00%)
Volume: 24 @10/04/19 2:31:14 PM EDT


The correlation between QPWR and CYPW runs deeper than you may realize. Remove the so called business each is/was attempting to break into and you will find they are/were both heavily influenced by the 2 individuals at the top of QPWR. Their real business model is selling stock, not doing what their PR's claim. Cyclone was successful in raising $10+ million dollars under the reign of Nelson without ever producing a single product. QPWR is a direct result of his realization that he wouldn't be able to keep CYPW afloat for much longer.

Why are venture capitalists interested? Heavily Discounted STOCK! The same exact thing happened at Cyclone. Once the cash was gone, CYPW had to pay the debt back with heavily discounted stock... You can imagine what those venture capitalists did with the stock.. I'll give you a hint.. They didn't hold onto it thinking it was a good investment.

I don't come here looking to make enemies, but rather to inform people with what I have experienced in dealing with those who run this company.

It wasn't that long ago I tried to warn jjr04001 of the same things before he invested in at $0.14+

I expect this to continue trending downward with occasional upticks prior to the release of PR's (aka fluffing it up before the sell off). Don't be surprised if there is news of the company forming a spin-off to focus on something specific. This will be a clear indication the insiders are prepping to jump ship.

-Chuck
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSAM News