Tuesday, October 01, 2019 1:03:58 PM
Unless the franchisee is stuck with the contract. But wants to make sure there is no easily identifiable association with the public company with 5 years of reputation and name brand recognition. Why would anyone not want that ? Especially when that’s what they paid for. And what kind of management would sign a franchise deal that allows the franchise to shed the name. It’s all very shady and since the company has made no mention of it in their update or in their recent filing. We can assume the worst? Why would that be? And who in their right mind would try and assert it’s a good thing for everyone? It boggles the mind.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM
BNCM COMPLETES MERGER WITH DELEX HEALTHCARE • BNCM • Oct 8, 2024 9:54 AM
CBD Life Sciences, Inc. (CBDL) Reaches Unprecedented Heights With Explosive Growth and Strategic Expansion in 2024 • CBDL • Oct 8, 2024 8:00 AM
Unitronix Corp. to Invest $3 Million in USA Unity Coin Project • UTRX • Oct 7, 2024 7:08 AM