Yes that was the "good" line from the statement.
So does this mean they never got any other data from sites before? I was under the impression they had... In that case, wasn't that reported back some years ago, so then, what's new? And what's old... me I'm getting old lol... actually I'm only 50 but these 10plus years have been.... interesting!
But, I would like a little more detail... what lab results are confirmed on site? If the power is insufficient then surely that has an impact on the results? We are talking about a field making device that reduces viscosity for a period of time, and for this to be commercially viable, then it would need to work for x and for y time that makes leaving chemical methods a no brainer option...
lets see that data... even if it's insufficient, it's worth seeing if it's all good, the only reason to keep that data is if it's not good, or could be construed at not good... but then withholding on it has the same effect on the share price, value of the company and regard of the company...
so it's an intriguing play they got going on... I would like to see it done differently, and so, it pains me to say I don't feel this management can pull it off... they are dropping the ball too much... it's surely not that complicated, I'm an architectural designer and done my fair share of project management, involving all sorts of professional consultants, engineers etc to manufacture a building, and other unique elements, I know about r&d design, functionality... who's the project manager of the AOT demo instalation? Power issues would have been top of my list given the history...
so AOT works, but is it viable and can the team get it together to bring it to the marketplace as a commercially viable option?
