InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 3387
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/20/2008

Re: shoondale post# 77223

Tuesday, 09/17/2019 2:25:24 AM

Tuesday, September 17, 2019 2:25:24 AM

Post# of 104562
Quote:

It would seem that any display manufacturer would be happy to have the competitive advantage of a superior display along with the advantage of lower costs and thus increased margins.
____

If you really read the shareholders letters Squires outlined the business plan - license and royalties, the purpose of which is to bargain the true value of the QD in the end product. If an OEM prefers to squeeze the last drop of blood out of Nanosys instead, that's their decision. Squires sticking to his guns is good business in the best interest of the shareholders. Short term thinking is not a formula for long term growth. QMC Is not trying to compete for the low profit market that Nanosys has cornered, to it's future detriment.

Further, QMC is doing well. Still $7 to $10 million in revenue to come from Assam this year for training, services and equipment. Are you falsely assuming that there won't be a QD Displays, QD LED or QDSC market in India? One billion plus strong!

Further, QMC just started a promising blockchain endeavor without needing cash outlay. Could you? I couldn't. Who could? Squires did! I don't worry about things that don't happen - there are probably good business reasons for that, and I applaud the good that happens.




'The above references an opinion and is for information purposes only. It is not intended to be investment advice. Seek a duly licensed professional for investment advice.'

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.