Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[kthomp19]

Brydon is correct that the warrants are "invalid" because they were a "taking."

I'm glad you used quotes, because otherwise your statement is incorrect. All you did was quote an allegation from a plaintiff, not a finding by a court.

Also, notice that these plaintiffs do not seek to overturn or otherwise invalidate the warrants. All they seek is money damages for pre-conservatorship shareholders. That is, even if they win the warrants will still exist.