InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,473.17
(
-0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,290.80
(
-0.61%
)
Dow Jones
39,134.76
(
0.77%
)
Brent Oil
85.01
(
0.37%
)
Bitcoin
64,888.85
(
-0.12%
)
Post# of 145041
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

trader59

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 192
Posts 16569
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 01/29/2018

trader59

Member Level

Re: 101King_Kong101 post# 84035

Friday, 09/13/2019 7:59:56 AM

Friday, September 13, 2019 7:59:56 AM

Post# of 145041
And, once again, paragraph (ii) would require that the bagholders of BioAmber be given over 50% of equity and voting control of the company taking ownership. No company is that stupid, nor is there one that can’t do the math of 21% (corporate tax rate) of the NOL’s vs the debt that would have to be assumed (in addition to the price of the fictitious secret purchase price).

LOL!!!!!

And those contracts are worthless. If they had any value, either the JV would have had them assigned or the creditors would have objected to the completion of the proceedings.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up