InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 810
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2005

Re: PhenixBleu post# 42587

Friday, 09/06/2019 1:20:59 PM

Friday, September 06, 2019 1:20:59 PM

Post# of 50023
It is an issue because you keep posting this and or similar references. —- “The litigation Stickie contains the Court's Order on the MTD. The judge tossed the GDSI/BSF Law Firm's Complaint for FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED. This means even BSF couldn't make GDSI look like they had a winning case. “ —— This is not correct at all “without prejudice” and a subsequent “amended” complaint means that the referenced ruling never happened as far as the legal proceedings are concerned. Rontan can not even use that MTD ruling as a matter of decided action going forward.

In short, In the course of the case the MTD never happened.

Also in general a ruling made “without prejudice” is not a ruling on the merit of the case.

“failure to state a claim” is a matter of merit.