FuboTV Inc (FUBO)

[RandomWalk44]

wrong - it can still be defamatory. it's just not actionable because of litigation immunity unless the statements are made outside of the litigation. the company also disclosed it as extortion. those are pretty strong words for a 10-Q. anyway what's the difference? the case was dismissed. see the 10-Q, page 20:


On August 27, 2018 plaintiff, Scott Meide, filed a pro se (unrepresented by counsel) complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, against Pulse Evolution Corporation, now a subsidiary of the Company, naming its former officers among others as defendants. The Company’s position is that the pro se Complaint is defamatory, without merit in fact or law and represents an extortive attempt to coerce payment under threat of reputational harm and filed a motion to dismiss on September 25, 2018. On July 24, 2019, all counts of the complaint were dismissed in favor of the Company. Mr. Meide has the right to file an amended complaint no later than August 26, 2019.