Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:31:27 PM
I’m trying to logic how they get the original investors to pony up $25/sh to begin with and then ask them to settle for 10% ($5)? It seems like a real Ponzi scheme but they raised billions. What was in it for them to fund this? Maybe if you were owed a lot of dough you sent some good money after bad $ to help them sort it out and pay you? IDK
I’d be pretty unhappy as an original investor ( read banker or professional investor) to not get at least my capital back. With the time value of money of that would be a real bad investment.
That brings me back to why originally invest. Also why settle for $5, better to hold off for the final final than only $5 bucks if I’m an original investor.
Me, I’m not only a late comer, 2016. But this is also my first rodeo in CT’s. I did find in the prospectus that any shares acquired by the issuer can cancel out the debt ( of course). That seems to me why the price yo-yos so low and any sells are snapped up.
It seems like any big players would want their capital back at least if not the FM.
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM