He thinks that I was being misleading because I didn't mention the last sentence (never mind I said exactly where it could be found):
I didn't mention it because it's marketing not disclosure.
No kidding it's possible. That's exactly the point. It goes without saying. That's why it's marketing - not disclosure. For him to say I was being misleading, he has to turn the marketing into disclosure. He's the one being misleading.
This whole discussion started when somebody tried to pass off a false 5 year old article like it was factual and had just happened and others tried to rationalize it by claiming it's possible that it's happening now. Like I said, no straw too small... LOL.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.