Here's some excellent thought provoking insights from a fellow inVYSTor folks>>>
JaMmY1 Wednesday, 08/14/19 10:56:45 PM
Re: None 0
Post #
112065
of 112096
VYST Investors,
We have endured many bumps along the way as this award winning, multi-decade family business joins forces with VYSTAR.
I found myself questioning my DD when hit with the different delays and surprises. So instead of hanging on every individual event - I asked myself very simple questions... and wrote down very honest answers:
Simple questions to answer honestly:
Would an 80 year old (millionaire) Steve Rotman give up a life-long reputation of integrity, to run a scam in his golden years?
Would Steve Rotman risk a family legacy of multiple decades by FINALLY becoming a public company - just to run it to the ground?
If VYST had no exploding potential, wouldn’t Steve Rotman just purchase a shell to go public, for a mere $300k and no previous share holders to answer to – instead of joining an entity with over $3 million in debt that he had to clear?
If Steve Rotman (as CEO of Vystar for over 1.5 years) was only paid in VYST restricted shares, wouldn’t his only financial incentive be to raise Vystar’s PPS?
If there was 1 CEO of 2 separate companies merging together, wouldn't he make the closing transaction as shareholder-friendly as possible?
Are there many Pink Stocks with over 290 form 4’s from insider purchases and NOT A SINGLE share sold by these insiders in the last decade?
Would Dr. Matthan (globally recognized and highly respected in his field) sign a contract with VYST - if he didn’t see amazing potential?
Would our award-winning Dr. Stone lend his precious time (in years), expertise and resources to a company without potential?
Is it common for a Pink stock to have its board members invest $20 million dollars of their own money?
Is Rotmans a real company - Is it really one of the top established furniture companies in the North East that we can actually visit and talk with real people?
How much business skill would be required to manage 150 – 200 employees, and a huge pension fund?
What kind of work environment would create a 22 year average length of employment – of over 150 employees (not your typical 5-10 staff members)?
If VYST falls flat on its face, who stands to lose the most – common shareholders like me, or the Rotmans & insiders?
There are many shareholders (including myself) who have been disappointed with delays, surprises and communication. But nothing that has happened can change any of my answers to the questions listed above. My impatience does not qualify as a fundamental change in the business blueprint. It will succeed with or without me. I intend to hold tight and take part in the journey.
Having answered the simple and logical questions above, I then let myself ask hopeful questions. Inspirational questions that allow me to set realistic goals and expectations.
I wonder what just 1 big future contract would do for VYST, in addition to the Rotmans added value?
...Maybe tires supplied throughout India from the work of our Dr. Matthan, who is the country's government appointed head of rubber/latex...
...Maybe Disney after testing our balloons...
...Maybe Bayer after testing our inhalers...
...Maybe different cities adding the Hughes Reactor to existing water structures...
...Maybe superior Vytex gloves in every hospital room...
...Maybe RxAir machines in every waiting room...
...Possibly more RxAir machines in Professional Sport locker rooms like the ones used by our current Super Bowl Champions (New England Patriots)...
...Maybe improved catheters and dialysis machines with our patented technology in the very capable hands of our medical award-winning Dr. Stone...
...Maybe shoes, condoms or any other of the 40,000 applicable items that our Vytex material can realistically improve...
How do you measure the financial growth possibilities of one single company that can disrupt MULTIPLE industries?
What will happen when Latex Manufacturers discover they no longer have to waste $10’s of thousands of dollars by discarding the leftovers in their production lines at the end of EVERY day, because Vytex can last an amazing 5 days in their production lines?
Come on!! Even if we ignore the fact that Vytex is superior in quality, as biodegradable as an oak leaf, practically non-allergenic and odor free…. Despite all these obvious benefits, I believe manufacturers would jump all over Vytex for the simple fact of saving $10’s of thousands of dollars a week in production waste – dramatically improving their bottom line.
It’s so cool that we can simultaneously save them money, while also giving them a much better product – AND decrease the global toxic effects of synthetic latex waste!! Tripple winner for profit, people and planet.
Could I be totally wrong? Absolutely. Am I a rookie investor new to the game? You bet.
When I see people taking the time, energy and effort on a daily basis
Never buy or sell based on my posts! My posts are just my opinion!
