Moller has been only contacted once and that was by email. Who knows if he actually saw the email. On Monday all three persons were sent the email so the chances are higher that someone will see it.
The patent application documents at www.splitpowerengine.com precisely show the shortcomings of the rotary engine. Moller's secret enhancements to the rotary engine are just that, either corrections or enhancements. This means that the rotary has inherent flaws. Moller's enhancements revolve around a better heat coating, better wearing seals, and turbo charging the air. The first two only will extend maintenance interval time and the last is done to engines already.
The fact that the prototype engine is not published is irrelevant. One skilled in the art of combustion and engines and aircrafts would immediately recognize the operations of an engine.
This is the basis of the Slit Power Engine and determine if you understand the foundation: When the speed of rotation is completely separated from the force which creates said rotation, and said force is placed at a moment arm distance from the axis of rotation, any practical weight can be vertically lifted. We know from jacking up a car that a moment arm (long pole) on a jack allows that 4,000 pound car to be easily lifted.
Everyone already knows that small duct aircrafts require a higher rotational speed due to the fact that the area of the blades is smaller and more air needs to move through the blades per second to match the volume of bigger blades (like a helicopter). The equation for horsepower is torque x rpm / 5252. The torque more or less remains the same which is equal to the weight of the aircraft. For a 3200 pound helicopter the general rpm is about 650. So 4000 x 650 / 5252 = 396 hp This number is proved by the specs of the Bell Ranger 206B-L4 which as a rotor diameter of 33 feet 4 inches and a width of 1 foot for a blade area of 33.3 square feet and an engine of 420 horsepower which is actually reduced to 317 due to drive shaft limitations.
A flying car would have a total duct area of about 8 square feet and all is proportional so 33.3 / 8 = 4.162, x 650 = 2705 rpm. Plug this into the equation and you get 3,200lbs x 2705rpm / 5252 = 1648 hp. 1,648 horsepower just to lift the same weight. One who has a basic understanding can easily see that separating force and rotational speed is the solution to both vertically lifting heavy aircrafts and those with small ducts. I haven't even factored in g-forces so a more powerful engine is needed because its wingless.
Architecture involves concepts, math, physics and geometry on paper based on known environmental forces and material properties. An engine along with fuel properties is no different. A building stands up based on calculations not a prototype, for every building and the acting forces are completely unique.
In summary, enough information has been published that one skilled in the art of combustion engines and flight can make a confident judgment call on the Split Power Engine. It is the engine of all future vertical flight.
Greenpower1 Wednesday, 08/07/19 09:03:13 AM
Re: InventionStocks post# 2093 0
Post #
2101
of 2104
I've been following this for a while and you keep posting how the rotary will never work, that you have an engine which will, people should buy Moller stock, Moller should license your engine and you keep contacting Moller but they never respond.
