Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[BigE1960]

It is all about context. If you want to start threads everyday presenting your opinions and conjecture regarding Nanoco's capabilities, you should feel free to do so.* I've always maintained that competitive analysis is proper here. However, it is not right to inject random, extraneous negative viewpoints. The discussion was based on the suggestion that Steve needs "to market his product better if it’s more superior than the competition." Like I said earlier, if you want to present data to support or dispute the idea about better marketing or the superior characterization, jump right in. But what does your opinion about failed partnerships or their CEO's stock ownership have to do with this? Don't you see how that was totally unrelated to the conversation?




* Though one should expect misinformation and unsupportable assumptions to be challenged.