Quantum Materials Corp. (fka QTMM)

[Kurt_Banoffee]

I agree 100%, a logical discussion and debate has to include the fact that Nanoco convinced Dow that they could scale up their process and produce a commercially viable product. This is EXACTLY where QMC/AMTRON are today. Dow was wrong in their assessment. It's yet to be see how this will turn out for AMTRON. What's illogical is to claim that it's a foregone conclusion that it will end up differently from Nanoco/Dow.

Thanks for pointing out to the people denying this simple fact that they are wrong.

How is Nanoco not relevant as a comparable?
Wouldn't logical discussion and debate include analyzing and comparing another public company trying to bring similar product to market?