![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/586365.png?cb=1494420597)
Wednesday, July 31, 2019 10:23:13 AM
2) Yes, it is true that it is hard (if not impossible) to conduct business while trying to avoid payment on $600,000 owed, when that debt has been rendered to a judgment. A judgment creditor has substantial rights to garnish receivables and assets and has substantial rights to subpoena a creditors business contacts so that they can learn about potential receivables. Lattuca has every right to garnish/take money as it comes in.
3) Companies don't typically avoid and/or mislead judgment creditors because of the substantial power those judgment creditors have. Even if a company believes the judgment was not properly entered or isn't due they typically take the prudent approach and try to enter into some sort of agreement that will make payment to the judgment creditor over time in exchange for the judgment creditor agreeing to cease collection efforts.
4) I don't think Lattuca's lawsuit is silly. Do you suggest he give up and let Kate make a lot of money selling shares while she refuses to pay him? I don't think you would give up so that Kate can make money if you were in his shoes. You would probably do the same thing Lattuca is doing.
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM