InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 5233
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/02/2011

Re: Harry Winston post# 49371

Tuesday, 07/30/2019 1:50:41 PM

Tuesday, July 30, 2019 1:50:41 PM

Post# of 52841
“Assuming that Greenshift wins the lawsuit outright (which rarely happens), there might not be many financial or other resources to transfer. “

Like you’ve stated. One of thr infringers has a very low price to book value. If their assets are worth what the book value suggests, there might be enough resources available to sell to other companies that are now holding a license for using the GERS developed technology. So apart from the money available, there might be some ways to pay enough to make the shareholders happy.

“Remember, the lawsuit was filed because Greenshift accused two dozen other companies of infringing on its' own issued patents. If Greenshift wins, no patents would change hands.”

Many, most and maybe all of the infringers are using a infringing technology delivered by ICM which holds patents that could change hands.

I don’t think you can compare the tobacco industry case to this case. Because that isn’t about patent infringement.