InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 5233
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/02/2011

Re: Harry Winston post# 49367

Tuesday, 07/30/2019 11:29:46 AM

Tuesday, July 30, 2019 11:29:46 AM

Post# of 52844
“Your November 2017 estimate of the settlement will have to be adjusted to factor in the current (2019) financial resources of any company that settles with Greenshift.”

You forget to factor in that the companies have been infringing longer also, so it might be they would need to pay more.

Also, the calculation was done on a very conservative estimate. It’s likely that the real windfall would be way larger, since I don’t think that Cantor Collburn likes to take the risk they did for the money they would normally get payed by GERS. And CC aren’t rookies at this game.

“As you've said yourself on this board, the other companies are already suffering. “

That’s why I say it might be that GERS will own a few Ethanol companies after the litigation.

“All of this assumes that Greenshift wins the lawsuit. That's a prediction that I won't make. “

(Almost) everybody who bought in at GERS bought in because of the lawsuit. Biggest reason... they had to much debt, where diluting and where reporting losses every quarter. So why buying GERS if you know they where not making any profit? The only reason I can think of, is because you believe they can wain the lawsuit.
Also everybody knows the risk what happens if they loose. It means game over. Because their patent is worthless, they would loose clients they already have, and probably will not be able to pay of their debt.

So it’s a all or nothing game. Not suiting for those lacking the balls. With a huge profit if they win, and imho the odds to win are very high.