Followers | 19 |
Posts | 6071 |
Boards Moderated | 3 |
Alias Born | 05/23/2019 |
![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/712755.png?cb=1666718157)
Sunday, July 21, 2019 6:54:24 AM
US FDA contests Gras rule should be upheld
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has defended its Generally Recognized as Safe (Gras) voluntary notification programme for food additives, saying it represents a reasonable interpretation of its statutory responsibilities and should be upheld.
The FDA’s position was set out in a 17 June cross-motion for summary judgement with respect to ongoing litigation over the agency’s ‘Gras rule’.
Under this scheme, food additives are permitted to be used without pre-market approval or notification to the agency, provided they meet the same safety standards of other approved substances.
In March, the plaintiffs in the case – the Environmental Defense Fund and the Center for Food Safety – argued that the process effectively permits industry to self-regulate its food contact substances. And it requested that the court vacate the rule and require the agency to develop new regulations compliant with the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938 (FFDCA).
But in its response, the FDA said that the plaintiffs had "not identified any aspect of the rule that is arbitrary and capricious or not authorised by law".
Their arguments, it said, rely on the "erroneous premise" that the FDA has given manufacturers the ability to make conclusive determinations of Gras status. This, it said, "is simply not so".
"The Gras rule operates the way many important government requirements do: the government sets mandatory standards for private conduct, and parties are expected to meet those standards, risking serious sanctions if they fail to do so," it said.
The agency also dismissed as lacking merit the argument that the rule’s criteria do not constrain manufacturers’ Gras determinations and allow substances to come to market based on "hidden" information.
"The Gras rule should be upheld as a reasonable agency interpretation of a broad congressional delegation of authority," it concluded. And it pressed the court therefore to judge in its favour on all claims.
The lawsuit, Center for Food Safety et al v Price et al, is being heard in the US district court for the southern district of New York. Plaintiff responses are due by 23 August.
https://chemicalwatch.com/78921/us-fda-contests-gras-rule-should-be-upheld
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/eas-assists-food-and-hemp-firms-with-fda-gras-submissions-300862775.html
Recent CVSI News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2024 01:10:34 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/12/2023 02:36:49 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2023 08:21:25 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2023 01:32:15 PM
Glidelogic Corp. Announces Revolutionary AI-Generated Content Copyright Protection Solution • GDLG • Jul 26, 2024 12:30 PM
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM