Home > Boards > US OTC > Delisted > Lans Holdings Inc. (fka LAHO)

Problem there is they have both openly admitted

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
ChillinZX Member Profile
 
Followed By 45
Posts 2,745
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/17
160x600 placeholder
ChillinZX   Saturday, 07/20/19 04:20:24 PM
Re: fahrenheitjules post# 30264
Post # of 63638 
Problem there is they have both openly admitted satisfaction with each other at the time the LOI was introduced, I'm pretty sure the LOI was a copy and paste job being used as a template, and being a template it has words like "60 days", "satisfaction", "declare", and other stuff in it. It is true LAHO pays for all the fees, which is why we have seen dilution and it's behind us, but if GSCG backs out GSCG pays a $500,000 fine to LAHO. If LAHO is somehow unsatisfied and backs out, it must be done no later then Monday and the LOI would be rendered invalid but no additional fines since LAHO is the one who initiated the LOI, they are the ones who could also terminate it.

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist