QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[As I See It]

You are still trying to compare an early test result utilizing beakers and test tubes to an AOT. Data from field testing at the RMOTC with the earlier small AOT blue prototype showed significantly lower power requirements.

The pump was set at a constant flow rate 46.56 m3/h...........We also paid attention to the pump power. Before the AOT device was turned on, the pump power was 14.2 kW. After the AOT device was turned on, the pump power was gradually reducing. When the treated oil filled up the whole pipeline, the pump power was down to 8.9 kW as the pressure loss was at the minimum.The energy saving was 5.3kW, while the AOT only consumed less than 100 W electric power.

To help with the math you should know that 46.56 cubic meters of oil is equivalent to approx. 293 barrels of oil. Please note that the power to treat the oil was 100 watts or 0.10kW. Beakers and test tubes treated 1 barrel of oil using 0.10kW while the blue prototype AOT treated 293 barrels while using the same 0.10kW. I'd say that is a significant increase in the scale of efficiency.