InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 2337
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/21/2010

Re: stock king 1 post# 235997

Tuesday, 07/16/2019 1:13:23 PM

Tuesday, July 16, 2019 1:13:23 PM

Post# of 255773
I’d suggest nobody buy any ONCI.

It’s not my opinion: Steve Berman is a fraud.

I suppose that if there hadn’t been SEC action taken against him I’d have to include “IMHO” or “in my opinion” and I suppose that I’d have to worry about things like “slander” or “defamation” but I don’t because Steve constantly says he’s doing things that he’s not doing.

Steve constantly tells INVESTORS he’s doing things that he’s not doing.


If I accused Bernie Madoff of fraud could he sue me? Sure! I suppose he could but then, through the course of law, I would expose his “profits” as fraudulent.


Hey Steve Berman! You’re nothing but a loser. You’re a con man and you’re an absolute fraud!


(Come get me Steve)

Anyone can see that Steve is lying in his tweets.

Can he prove that he’s called GEICO?

Yes.

And even though GEICO is not my insurer I can call them too.

Can I prove I had a meeting with someone at GEICO?

Sure!

Insurance agents are easy to have meetings with. I can call anyone from GEICO and have a meeting this afternoon.


Is there a paper trail of meetings about you taking a look at ONCI as a provider?


That’s where any investor has Steve by the short and curlies.

Steve has simply said too much and there is not any proof.

He’s a fraud.

He thinks he can tweet anything and he actually can because most of you won’t actually pursue it.

You’ve lost a few hundred or a few thousand and that’s as far as it’ll go.

Heck...95% of you who say you’ve contacted the SEC actually haven’t.

If this guy had a dollar of mine in his bank account he’d get what’s coming.


I don’t need to say IMO.

When I research a company I research the crap out of it.

Steve Berman is saying whatever he wants (especially when he’s been drinking because he has a drinking problem) because he knows most of you are grandmas and grandpas or people who don’t understand the SHA1933/1934.

Investors have Steve by the danglies.


He just tweeted that he had secured the offer to send out 1000 mailers.

Heck... I can take the afternoon and skip golf and send 1000 mailers to anyone... but where is the paper trail that I had a meeting where some insurance company with 5000 clients and I can send 20% of them mailers?



Steve is a con man and fortunately he is also an idiot and anyone whose lost money with him can sue him directly.


Most times a company tweet does not mean that you can sue the CEO.


However... since Steve is ONCI and ONCI is Steve (no marketing team, no legal team, no design team....heck... he doesn’t even have a secretary) he can be directly sued.



That’s why it cracks me up that he writes the crap he writes.



So he decides “efff this guy... I’m going to sue him)

Well... he’d better hire a “legal team” (or have one on retainer) and he’d better hire a “marketing team” (or have one on retainer), and he’d better hire design “team”, (or have one on retainer)


He’d better have all of those and so much more because his tweets indicate that he’s a company, with pre-existing legal and design and marketing “teams”

He’s a fraud.

He’s no better than a con man.



The saddest part of it all is that he’s fooling people who really can’t afford to be fooled.

Steve? You’re a con man. You’re a fraud. This is not my opinion. It is fact. How you want to prove me right is up to you.