Correct. Those looking for things to say against CELZ can read the same sentence and interpret it differently that those looking to find positive things. The same sentence being read while the PPS was moving up in the pennies would have been read completely differently. It’s the PPS driving some bonkers.
We will see who is right when the year plays out and we see the increasing revs, more and more patient testimonials and the trial paper is issued. I have seen nothing that suggest CELZ is doing anything wrong or lying about anything. I hope those trying to make a case call the SEC and get there satisfaction. Maybe they have the fortitude to post when the SEC finds nothing wrong!!!
Some employees have come and some have gone from the company, same as every company. What’s the hang up with that I do not know. I know my company hires and fires everyday with no press releases.
As for the poster who had the treatment. First, NO ONE ever said CaverStem works 100%, 100% of the time. Dr. Said has posted that he has seen improvement in all of his patients so far. That is super cool to see, but it is a small sample size, correct? Probably getting near 75-100 patients is my guess, but let’s see how it plays out. I imagine that a 55 year old having some early stage issues has a very high success rate vs someone who has highly risky behaviors and continues those behaviors after treatment. But who knows? Not me for sure. I hope all patients find some form of improvement no matter what hit them where they are!!!!
Why get hung up on one person who did not find the fix for them? Does that make the entire company a scam?? Of course not. It’s the percentage of patients, rightly or wrongly, that fall into that small percentage of patients that do not react to treatment, period. Pretty simple really.
Let’s not let shareholder frustration in the PPS get in the way of thinking the treatment does not work or is the entire company is a scam. At least I know the CEO preferred shares vs CASH. Pretty cool if you ask me.
