InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 167
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/28/2005

Re: bubba_smh post# 1745

Tuesday, 11/21/2006 11:51:03 AM

Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:51:03 AM

Post# of 12660
The facts are that (1) the agreement was signed in Oct 2001 and (2) clause 1.4 talked about a possible BLA approval in 2003 which would dovetail with the plan at the time to file on TTP for AA. So the stricken out date in 12.3 should refer to that tentative date whatever it was. Nobody in their right mind would think that that had anything to do with the current tentative BLA approval date. With the contract ending this year, DNDN decided not to renew and that was that.

But this is Dew's typical drive-by mouth shooting mode without thinking through. When pointed out wrong as by p3analyze in this case, he would mumble some weak excuses before slinking off with the usual "Take the last word if you want." You can be sure that if he could have the last word, he would. Maybe Dew will come back some time to explain why DNDN finished the factory or filed the BLA after his prediction that they wouldn't because they were just lying about the whole thing.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.