Not entirely. I'm aware of the formula of expected value in probability theory (and I like it), and there's an overlap, but I'm also saying something else.
Let's go back 2 years ago, after Solomon visited Sweden. Expectations were rather high. The odds, in our favor. Solomon would do this and that, we all remember the list with a dozen "triggers". Nothing came of it. The stock came down because expectations were also coming down...
Another example. I lost money on NFLX puts through the years. What did I do wrong? Well, first of all they were doing a lot of deals and I underestimated the strength of their brand. But the thing is, I was buying puts at a time when market expectations were rising, instead of going down. That was my mistake. (If you could call it that because I was just hedging a bit against a market crash).
I still haven't made my point, I think. So let's try this. In 2014 the stock was trading at $3. Then ECAB signed the bond. They were effectively buying stock for $7.50. The stock went from $3 to $17 but it took a while... Why did the stock go up? NOT because sentiment was improving. NOT because we had more buyers than sellers (although that is also important) But because expectations were going up... We had the Mega Farm, we had financing, and FD would solve all our problems. lol. So, I don't have to be right about the outcome (my predictions) as long as expectations are rising... is what I'm trying to say.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.