Post 13524 I posted last week. Look it up.
"There's errors. Mathematically has to. 303-233=70. Since they say about 233mil, I'm gonna say 229 instead which makes it feb18 filing date. So that makes sense, and they should fire accountant. They've issued that amount since feb 18th or technically the 19th of feb. not since 3/31. That's an extra 6 weeks. Which actually makes a big difference in percentage of dilution per day. And if you look, the 19th was the last time the stock had a high of .058 for quite awhile. And it all correlates with my prior message showing that it pops about once a month about that time. Just coincidence? Maybe"
One thing I forgot to mention is that February 18th, was the filling date of the prior 10Q.
So let's say from feb18-march31st, the os went from 74mil to 141mil, and from then to NT10k to 303. Here the point to all of this. I can't stress this enough, that I cannot prove anything I've found about Lerner which is awesome or about their share structure, but what if the 139 was posted in the wrong field and it's the float? The transfer agent would update that, and that's what he had. What if we're about to get some form 4s posting from insiders and from debt collectors which I believe that's another form that I can't think of right now, that they're not putting the shares in the market. They're issued by Irnc, which they have to be, but they're not going to actually drop? And if you look at the dates of when loans were taken out, and when patents were filed....looks more like these are investors that are willing to wait for way higher prices. Just my 2 cents.
