Tuesday, July 02, 2019 11:07:55 AM
Only up to the limit of the funding commitment. I think FnF have around $200B combined that they haven't drawn yet. If FnF were to sustain losses higher than that amount, FnF bondholders stand to lose money (after all FnF equity holders are wiped out, of course).
Nope. The government doesn't guarantee any FnF bonds and they never have.
Now you're right that unwinding the SPSPAs gets them out from under the funding commitment, albeit at an unreasonably high cost; why pay $300B to avoid maybe having to shell out $200B someday?
Wrong again, because this doesn't explain why Treasury insisted on getting warrants for other bailout participants like AIG and Citi. The 79.9% warrants were just standard operating procedure for Treasury at the time, and designed to enhance taxpayer returns along with avoiding moral hazard.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM