Tuesday, June 25, 2019 12:38:02 AM
lol, probably the universe had a glitch
As I was myself in the doubt (because it didn't make logical sense why wait for 298 and compare 3years survival while 3 years survival is already measured for 90% of the patients) I asked "at a median of 3 years" meaning to Dr Talor and he told me it was an estimate for the duration of the time it takes to get to 298.
And he repeated :
"Primary enpoint is event driven not time driven" which means, we need to wait till 298, not compare things at a specific year.
I am 100%, 1000%, 10 000% sure right now. So you can safely bury deeply this "3 years" thing.
I am sure also other posters will raise it again and again though
Recent CVM News
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM
