Tuesday, June 25, 2019 12:38:02 AM
lol, probably the universe had a glitch
As I was myself in the doubt (because it didn't make logical sense why wait for 298 and compare 3years survival while 3 years survival is already measured for 90% of the patients) I asked "at a median of 3 years" meaning to Dr Talor and he told me it was an estimate for the duration of the time it takes to get to 298.
And he repeated :
"Primary enpoint is event driven not time driven" which means, we need to wait till 298, not compare things at a specific year.
I am 100%, 1000%, 10 000% sure right now. So you can safely bury deeply this "3 years" thing.
I am sure also other posters will raise it again and again though
Recent CVM News
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
