InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 5166
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/08/2011

Re: cottonisking post# 84451

Thursday, 06/20/2019 12:02:01 PM

Thursday, June 20, 2019 12:02:01 PM

Post# of 111141
I spoke in court yesterday. After, I made the point about the [CTs is parity with the ECAPS] in court. Judge Chapman allowed the Plan Administrator to respond. The Plan Administrator said, "I needed to have relied on the June 9, 2005 Board of Directors' General Guarantee parity with ECAPS' clause in the prospectus when I purchased my CTs."

Docket 58763 filed on August 27, 2018, by the Plan Administrator, with the data collected and compiled by the ECAPS' RSM Restructuring Advisory LLP team made me aware of the parity with ECAPS. More than eight years after the ECAPS' five partnerships' General Partner was terminated in June of 2010. This one docket has a copy of all the contracts. I have purchased more CTs since August 27, 2018.


So, the question becomes, did any holder, out of 48,000,000 shares outstanding rely on the June 9, 2005 Board of Directors' General Guarantee parity with ECAPS' clause in the prospectus when they purchased their CTs?

Major factor: For the first time, the Debtors have this information on the hearing transcript for the world to read! WE MADE OUR POINT!

These are forward looking statements. I am not looking back! LOL