InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 282
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/26/2019

Re: motherinlaw2 post# 3842

Wednesday, 06/19/2019 8:27:48 AM

Wednesday, June 19, 2019 8:27:48 AM

Post# of 13959
Hi ,not here to fight about it! but unless I'm missing something I don't see what terms were broke other than IMNP car ran out of gas and no money to buy more YET. I'm sure if Bert was approved and IMNP wanted to sell it ICO would be on board(as their just waiting for their Milestone $)other than future milestones the rights were bought and paid for by IMNP. I"m just asking how or why you think they will get back BERT after selling rights. ICO rights are for milestone $ . I read the terms for BERT deal but I'm a jerk not a lawyer but seems really one side in IMNP favor. I don't believe ICO is going to spend or waste $ on this fighting for something there not going to get. I'm just asking why you think its going back to them ? what was breached? I feel they are just saying hey! don't forget about us you greedy stealing thieves.
Lets say something was breached -all IMNP hard work and $ invested are just handed back to ICO ?PHase 1+_2 trials and other costs and tweaks.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.