InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 7698
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/24/2007

Re: zeroedin post# 47611

Friday, 06/14/2019 8:14:30 PM

Friday, June 14, 2019 8:14:30 PM

Post# of 57228

Had you ever stoped to think that the AOT might not need to be placed after a pump station to be effective??? Perhaps we can possibly call the AOT a "PUMP STATION PLUS". I can foresee pump stations being built with the AOT technology Incorporated into the design. Even if the AOT had less-than-stellar results, couldn't you see a licensing deal being done with pump station building companies??? AOT 2.0 BABY...
That would free QSEP from the responsibility of building AOT'S at all... The companies that build pumping stations would do all the work and we would just collect licensing/toll fees”

Oh you mean they would just license the tech to pump manufactures and sit back get fat printing money....such a great dream but chances of that happening are infinitesimally small. Besides Qsep has never attended a single trade or commerce event where these type of deal
get done. Also...the company owes Temple over a million dollars for the right to this alleged tech with 10% interest clicking off every year. Even the most ardent Qsep supporter has to wonder why this issue never goes goes away gets resolved into commission only arrangement. Instead more nanocap conferences!