InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 291
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/16/2015

Re: Maria56 post# 51753

Monday, 06/10/2019 11:38:46 PM

Monday, June 10, 2019 11:38:46 PM

Post# of 97133
For a company like Broadridge to issue a Hold harmless Agreement their corporate attorneys would have to be involved at every level especially when fraudulent activities are involved and money was owed to Broadridge.

Broadridge TA would never release monies owed to them when they could file a judgment on WOGI and caused more problems with FINRA.

Instead, Broadridge and their attorneys reviewed the fraudulent claim presented to them from WOGI that Mathew P Dwyer presented a false electronic signature of the old CEO Nathan Hall and fraudulently stole 23million shares from WOGI to trade in the open market and short the stock and screw the company and all its other investors.

I would encourage any and or all persons to call to verify this with Broadridge because the WOGI cant make this claim and show the evidence written by Broadridge and people still say it not real. WOGI would be in hot water.

I did my verified DD and it's real!