InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2018

Re: boston745 post# 24431

Sunday, 06/09/2019 3:49:59 PM

Sunday, June 09, 2019 3:49:59 PM

Post# of 41257
I cannot for the life of me figure out what happens to an institutes money shorting against the box here from the very beginning. Trying to factor in the RS and dilutions and tax loop holes. I find it as hard as thinking in 4 dimensions with a brain adapted to fruit picking. I suspect there may be a way to control the entire bag at share prices of "nothing" perhaps without losing a dime and muscle other investors out without the similar tools at their disposal.

However this control would, I think, guarantee an immediate yes vote on RS. Since it would continue muscling out other investors. Unless there's no need for a new yes vote since majority stake has been developed sufficiently. Long time question: who owns the shares? Still no reporting on that. Still no answer.

Pure unadulterated speculation. What I would do is engage in voter fraud. presented with 60 no 40 yes of the 75% of votes entered. There's a possibility of dumping 20% of those no votes. Never counting them. Then hunting Yes votes in the 25% of no contest. Not sure how secure this voting system is. If I remember it looked about as secure as a "vote for your favorite dorito" online ballot.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News