InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2010

Re: Joe Stocks post# 84261

Saturday, 06/08/2019 12:50:16 PM

Saturday, June 08, 2019 12:50:16 PM

Post# of 111087
I understand your position and bias, joe stocks.

Your problem is you continue to mischaracterize and ignore the rights of the CT shareholders in your narratives and bias.

In 2011, the CTs were in a 20 Quarter deferment period.

What were they to contest? The Plan Administrator left open the case the CTs would be paid if they had the money and they needed a process to determine that availability.

Since then, the Court has approved stays while they settle casework of other subsidiaries and address all interested parties.

The concessions the Courts have required while over-looking the rights of CT shareholders in the CT prospectus is not a failure of the CT owners.

The Courts have known the rights of the CT owners and have listened to LBHI legal reps arguments to make restitution in the future for the CTs.

So, if they needed accommodations and concessions, it is time for the Court to tell the Estate to pay for them.

You are not above the law, joe stocks.

mojo