InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253566
Next 10
Followers 75
Posts 4754
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: CT post# 225210

Saturday, 06/08/2019 12:25:40 PM

Saturday, June 08, 2019 12:25:40 PM

Post# of 253566
FGEN

Anemia is not your biggest problem at this stage (GFR<15), is it?



It is *a* problem. But, yeah, probably not your only big problem (e.g. see CHF, or acidosis or ...)


Anyway, am I wrong in now concluding that roxa's MACE benefit is right where you would expect (hope) it to be? Prior to kidney failure (15 < eGFR < 60) and also during incident dialysis.



As I noted in the original post, and on twitter, I am agnostic on this. My prediction is about the split, not the absolute values of either GFR>15 or GFR<15. E.g. Maybe for GFR>15 the MACE/MACE+ HR is 1.05, still nominally worse than 1.0, but much better than 1.25 for GFR<15?

Oh, and one more comment - I'd be surprised if MACE/MACE+ HR was "stat sig superior" in GFR>15. They probably have too few events in the GFR>15 group.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.