InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1047
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2017

Re: None

Monday, 06/03/2019 11:11:40 PM

Monday, June 03, 2019 11:11:40 PM

Post# of 31731
My point is being misunderstood. The various government arms have created the issues with conflicting laws even at the federal levels and state(s). First point, if you have an end chemical product, say CBD in this case, there is no way to tell if it came from a hemp plant or a cannabis plant. So if you say one plant is legal "hemp" and the other "cannabis" is not, does that make the CBD from one legal and the other not, when there is NO way to tell the difference?

Currently these type of issues exist. The USDA and the FDA both have a say in it. The states and the Fed have a say, and the Feds can control states from inter state commerence.

AND yes the FDA does have a say with supplements, in many ways, through labeling, medical claims, impurities such as pesticides, lead, impurities, etc.

PLUS there is one drug for epilepsy that received FDA approval with CBD, so now they (FDA) call it a "drug", which gives them the right to control it, if they choose.

They have a lot to sort out. I am LONG in this stock, but this is the situation. They claim they want to sort it out fast, and I'm betting they will.