InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2010

Re: Joe Stocks post# 84166

Friday, 05/31/2019 1:18:07 PM

Friday, May 31, 2019 1:18:07 PM

Post# of 111126
joe stocks,

Do you ever ask yourself, "What is the fraud and when did it start? Am I advocating for fraud and why? Why should the perpetrators get away with the crime?"

What did the CT shareholders do?

The CT holders read the guaranty in the prospectus, bought the shares at a low price, were assumed to reject the POR that impaired the trading value and let the Court and re-structuring divisions pursue what they decided to address all concerns, even if it meant re-allocating to Senior Classes while their shares continue to trade over the pinks.

The shares can be exchanged for other shares in a re-structured firm. The entire subordinated issue totals over $17.65B.

The CT holders didn't change the rules, over ride a prospectus and move the goal posts. They did nothing illegal. They didn't hold the fire sale.

You advocate for the debtors who would abscond with this subordinated position.

Do you ever listen to yourself as you post?

What more can CT holders do?

Good luck.

mojo