QS Energy Inc (QSEP)

[mr_sano]

“
1.Please explain why we are about to go on another pipeline of a major multi-billion dollar energy company to test the AOT's ability to reduce viscosity of crude oil with an electric field. “

Because Qsep could not find willing partner so they had to paid for it to get access to the tune of 500k plus maintenance and who knows what else! It’s interesting this is used as proof but nobody knows who what or where...Apparently opaque is the the new transparent.
“
2.Please explain the report from the second largest Chinese oil company verifying that Dr. Tao's electric field did in fact reduce the viscosity of crude oil.”

China??? Please they will say anything and anything stated is easily manipulated. Pundits now want to believe it was all admin issues but the fact is clear no orders no continued testing no modifications means no benefit was provided other than fluff that management can continue to distort into false hope.
“
3.Please explain how the AOT was run for one week, 24 hours a day, on a live pipeline in China achieving "results consistent with" the amazing lab test results I highlighted in post #46965. “

Lol...dude. 24 hour run is not even a test is not the methodology
Pipeline operation use when testing new technology. They take months of trails in all kinds of weather with varying batches of oil. If they pulled it off the line in 24hrs something major was wrong and it was likely to go boom!

“
4.Please explain how the engineers working for the DOE verified test results indicating the viscosity of crude oil was reduced by the AOT.”


Doe conclusion of the report said; “ may warrant further investigation” yet they would not fund additional
Tests...wow what a great vote of confidence with test that flawed from the get go.

“5.Please explain how ATS concluded that the AOT reduced viscosity of crude oil treated on the TransCanada pipeline. Don't throw in the red herring about the initial test being flawed. ATS said that a subsequent test showed viscosity reduction and that it could have been better if the engineering of the device was improved. “

Coulda woulda shoulda....no legit company delivers a poorly engineered device on its only shot on a major line and then screws the pooch on successive tries. Tcpl failed then Kmcc...yet all of it is spun as a success. Qsep must believe its shareholders will never examine the actual facts with any level of scrutiny...but I will!