InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 7696
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/24/2007

Re: alkalinesolution1 post# 47263

Thursday, 05/23/2019 5:40:30 PM

Thursday, May 23, 2019 5:40:30 PM

Post# of 57076
It doesn’t have to work as long as management shows movement and the “ can “ gets kicked down the road. That’s the gig. Many of the Preceding management have landed new positions in other OTC companies so Qsep is a decent springboard to hone ones chops in penny land. Honestly...saying industry doesn’t recognize the scientific benefit is illogical thinking. Qsep has had many opportunities with several management teams and still couldn’t put a single score on the board. This after 22 years and 100M $ of trying! The concept that qsep must have proven its tech because they continue to work at it , is a frightening conclusion. There are a glut of fuel saving devices on the market today based on similar theories and all are complete bunk..yet still available for sale with new versions popping up all the time. Qsep was founded based on a flagship product based this type which was supposedly reengineered and confirmed by Tao to increase mileage per gallon of upwards of 15% by simply attaching its magnetic fuel device. As incompetent as management might have been at landing deals it pails in comparison to the inventors ability to prototype a workable device that would demonstrate its benefit without question. Investors have a right to question managements inability to land deals but if Qsep ever wants to be viewed as a legit company they will need to get rid of Tao. He is a headline seeking prof that is ill equipped to bring any new tech to market. So while past management is complicit in poor execution of company strategy most of the blame of not getting deals must be placed on the inventor inability to deliver measurable performance.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent QSEP News