InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 849
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/28/2017

Re: 1dmg1 post# 19441

Tuesday, 05/21/2019 8:36:08 AM

Tuesday, May 21, 2019 8:36:08 AM

Post# of 53160
It is unethical for him to report revenue numbers that were reported and never retracted when it is evident that time for deals to close would preclude revenue recognition for at least a year which is the same year he was forecasting those very same revenue recognition numbers.

That unfortunately is the problem at hand.

Had he stated $70M rev recognition on closing of both deals which may take up to 2 years and require a significant burden on shareholders and share price, then there would be much less negative sentiment at this point.


If you like my post, click the +1 donation button at the top of the message.

If you'd just like to donate +1 without ranking my post, here is my address: PJjbdSmpvuJX3Un8TxGBzXdaQ37jJoeGum

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SGMD News