InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2018

Re: boston745 post# 24091

Friday, 05/17/2019 5:03:52 PM

Friday, May 17, 2019 5:03:52 PM

Post# of 41230
Cash on hand:

4.16m after burning 1.3m Q1.

1.3m a quarter. 5.2 million dollars a year. To keep the lights on. Not enough capital to develop hips. Right now this feels like a one man band. Bryan Mcentire. Let me just consider everyone else here at Sintx his paid assistant. If this where a shill org. by Zimmer as a hands off process of product development(theres valid examples for that) I think I would see enough cash flow for hip development.

But wait there's more. You're also getting guys working towards this we're not even paying salaries on. Kyoto. LLJ etc.

So is CTL the funded shill org? The first step in consolidation and adoption? as part of the hands off process of tech. development? Try before you buy? moar liek try before you launch? amirite? Hate to launch an inferior product (or merger) (or not adopted product) that ripples ramifications through your well positioned stock.

Let's look at this. Who is Daniel Chon? is he a shill for stryker for instance? Why is he not in Brazil then? It doesnt feel right without more info:

earliest example we got on chon is 2011 at Accel spine.

"CTL Medical Corporation recently announced it has reached an agreement to acquire AccelSPINE."

"“AccelSPINE is a leader in our industry, and they have a proven track record of producing exceptional medical products. Acquiring AccelSPINE not only helps advance our global growth strategy, but it also helps us meet the needs of our growing customer base,” Andy Choi, chief business development officer of CTL Medical Corporation, said in the release."

Chon@ACCEL + Choi@CTL = CTL medical

Im asking myself the wrong question. Who is Andy Choi?

First relevant example is Business director, Chief engineer, spine and orthopedics from 2003-2011. 8 Years at Stryker. I'm not taking this for face value. I`ll show you why I think this is misleading.

He leaves vertiflex as vice president of R&D in 2014. it's not until 2019 that vertiflex is acquired by boston scientific.

then VP R&D at NuVasive and leaves in 2015. This is when he enters CTL medical from 2015 to 2017. The Accel + CTL merger is dated january 2016. This plays into the timeline almost exactly. According to the timeline his work at CTL is done.

More on NuVasive. NuVasive has not received a buyout. It's successfully kicking it on its own. HOWEVER NuVasive To Acquire Ellipse Technologies is dated JAN 2016. Choi leaves Nuvasive in NOV 2015. I`ll argue JAN 2016 is the date of announcement on this. I`ll also drop a reminder his position here is Vice president of Research and Development< just in case that helps with picking up what im laying down.

What's the next play here with Choi? After CTL? Co-founding IntuitiveX

"IntuitiveX is a life science incubator created to help inventors and entrepreneurs transform their ideas into products and services that scale into businesses which help patients lead healthier, more productive lives."

BOOM. that makes total sense with Choi and helps solidify what Im thinking here. The puzzle pieces are fitting.

But why does this not detail a career of scouting for Stryker? There's no evidence for that here. Stryker is not the elephant in the room. Therefore I`ll extrapolate. Zimmer is not the elephant either. Zimmer does not pay Kyoto institute of Japan for instance. I would not depend on Zimmer or Stryker to scout or incubate the life science advancements. They're good at sales and running a supply chain.

So what is the elephant in the room? Something that conglomerates my assumptions. When conglomeration occurs on assumptions. I`m usually on to something:

Roll this timeline back on Choi. All the way back to what appears to be the beginning.

R&D engineer at space systems Loral...space systems. Now all the way back on the timeline. His final education is 4 years mechanical engineering at Berkeley, university of California.

Bachelors degree in mechanical engineering:4 years

Associates degree in Marketing: 2 years(ill throw down Rutgers if that means anything to you.)

Some kind of training course in executive education/competitive marketing.

This is the entirety of listed education. Looks like he's immediately recruited through Berkeley into Space systems on the timeline. Berkeley is a golden ticket into the jobs market according to the timeline on the resume into space systems. The rest of education comes AFTER. education to prepare a mechanical engineer for something. A man sitting there in what appears to be a comfy mechanical engineer role in space systems and stryker now goes back to school to prepare himself. according to the timeline this is being incubated at stryker. But why is he not scouting for stryker then??

This seems like a good time to take this back to the argument and drop that Berkeley is home to a national lab.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), commonly referred to as Berkeley Lab, is a United States national laboratory that conducts scientific research on behalf of the United States Department of Energy (DOE).



We're seeing alot of this cross play between nationally controlled institutes and private sector. For example: Ceramatec and the DOE. Halliburton and the POTUS. Coors involvement in the Heritage foundation.

is an American conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. primarily geared towards public policy. The foundation took a leading role in the conservative movement during the presidency of Ronald Reagan, whose policies were taken from Heritage's policy study Mandate for Leadership.[4] Heritage has since continued to have a significant influence in U.S. public policy making, and is considered to be one of the most influential conservative research organizations in the United States.



which drops down 4 levels in the pyramid into coorstek. The medical branch..More examples: Lockheed marten's skunk works. This appears to be a single organism. Obviously private sector organisms play a role in national institutions. I think its safe to say National institutions are dependent on the private sector. Is it safe to say Private sector is dependent on national institutions? would they be able to exist with out the national infrastructure?

Here's another facet to be considered:

AMD Selected by the U.S. Department of Energy to Help Drive Next-Generation Supercomputing Hardware Architecture



So the DOE needs super computers? when I think department of energy I dont think super computers. Ceramatec batteries or engines makes sense. Since Ceramatec had some kind of relationship with DOE we can say DOE is interested in the development of cat litter.

What if this was a play to lock down AMD as a US company? Once AMD cashed that check from the DOE it locks down AMD. AMD can no longer can be bought up by a Chinese firm, for instance. This might be relevant since AMD was once on the brink of failure and where forced to sell off their foundries to produce silicon: Global foundries. We lost this capability as a nation to another nation.

"The Emirate of Abu Dhabi is the owner of the company through its subsidiary Advanced Technology Investment Company (ATIC). "

That could potentially have rippling effects into national security. Might be of interest to not divest our assets as a nation. Especially if as a nation we're technically funding them.

And looks like the wego medical deal is highlighted by the lack of seeking approval in China of AMEDICA devices. No longer mentioned in the current SEC filing. But still seeking approval in Japan. A nation considered a strategic partner.

In soviet Russia what private sector do you leave alone with a nuclear power plant to muck about all willy nilly? NONE.



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News