InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 514
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/09/2017

Re: Burnttoast247 post# 16266

Friday, 05/10/2019 10:13:04 PM

Friday, May 10, 2019 10:13:04 PM

Post# of 27413
Thanks, Burnt, I read this report earlier in the week. It reads pretty positive to me, but I'm a bit surprised the efficacy numbers aren't a bit stronger, i.e., the septic patient mortality rate reduction from 78% to 65% using CTSO's filter, and the observed mortality of 29% vs the predicted 31% for CPB patients (I'm not even sure what that is; cardio bypass surgery?).

I think a number of the "early" studies, those of the last few years, showed a bias toward delayed/late usage of the filter, and they also seemed to run them for 16 - 24 hours before replacing them. So maybe that's why the apparent results weren't more impressive. Then again, maybe these results are impressive, I'm no doctor or clinician; but based on the cases of the week and the tens of thousands of successes, I know I would certainly want a CTSO filter in my cardio loop if anything went south. The one consistent finding through the years has been 100% safe.

And thanks for all your posts!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CTSO News