Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ)

[monte379]

My only disagreements or differences with your opinion is that it is my understanding the trial results must be made public, good or bad. They cannot hide them, period. CELZ is NIT hiding them AND, it’s not in their control when the peer review is done and they can issue the results, they are not lame excuses, it’s the process.

Maybe you missed the training notices, FemCelz updates and five new doctors inquiring. A bit more than a cut and paste IMO, but that is subjective.

And to intimate that the Q1 won’t be announced is unfair. They have been filing on time as a QB for years with one late notice that was three days late.

The reaction, if any, to the Q will be interesting to say the least. I don’t know any shareholder thinking we blast off from the revs. The revs will simply be nice and growing. It will be just like last year, each Q being better as they grow, but clearly it will be better than any previous Q. 2018 revs were just from Gershman for the most part.

2019 clearly has several new doctors buying empty boxes in Q1, so, just like we have said, it’s will clearly be better than Q4 2018, and for the same reasons as we watch Florida, SF, TN, TX and Ohio come online, Q2 will be better and so on.

It’s a marathon not a sprint for me.