eCobalt Solutions Inc. (fka ECSIF)

[farml1234]

This is big

This has to do with rare earths minerals , clean up of Nuke stuff and more

you can read all the good stuff in this lawsuit on the Stockhouse UCU board


Answered --- Izatt issues are 100% related to "Suncor"
In this, the Second Utah Lawsuit, IBC and Mr. Izatt assert 7 causes of action. The first and second causes of action are for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. IBC and Mr. Izatts complaint goes on for pages, but the actual conduct that allegedly amounts to the various alleged breaches of contract and breaches of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing all occurred outside of Utah, mostly in Canada. Specifically, IBC and Mr. Izatt allege that Ucore breached the contracts by: ------* the excluded exhibits that follow, are actually Ucore press releases because it continues with---- " These announcements were made by a Canadian company, (Ucore) in Canada. ------ Now drop down to G. " .......... (g). Ucore is a Canadian company and at the time these disputed agreements were developed, its officers resided in Canada, so it would presumably have drafted the agreements from its office in Canada. (h). SUNCOR is a Canadian company just like Ucore. See Suncor Articles of Amalgamation attached hereto as Exhibit F.---- Ucore is a Canadian company, so the laws, rules, and regulations it is subject to are Canadian. Indeed, IBC and Mr. Izatt cite to the Canadian regulations that Ucore has allegedly violated. (j). . Ucore would have necessarily MADE THESE PAYMENTS from Canada, where it resides. ---------( There it is, all 7 causes of action are based on Izatt being jealous of a Suncor / Ucore ---- MRT, deal ). Two weeks I found the Utah case and saw Suncor for Exhibit F, I posted it here and never doubled back on some of it. This document being posted today answers everything "Izatt" and glad you guys kept looking into the case, because I for one had moved on and forgot and would have probably never read these excerpts. ------Everything makes sense now: re-read the MOSP news. It excludes IBC. My bet is this ------ Suncor is in fact if not in the original, they are involved indirectly or directly with the Extension Agreement. It's that Agreement IBC is basing their amended claims on. Laymens terms: the MOSP is a known success and Suncor most likely has; 1) 1st right refusal for MRT oil sands based ---- $$ millions upfront. 2 ) Suncor is buying exclusive world-wide oil sands MRT rights ----$$ millions up-front. You can add a world of potential options/deals via Suncor & Ucore MRT.......anyone of them is potentially staggering pay-out(s). It's why Izatt is now nuttier than a squirrels turd. I mean look at the writings in this ruling ------- he even used Canadian laws to bring his Canadian complaints and now challenges jurisdiction!!?? l....m...b...o .. Thanks for keepin the Utah link alive Lightning and Pimpboss. To answer Dragon on is Izatt's game just to stall ---- he won't win with Suncor waiting in the wings, wanting to squeeze as much profits from their oil sands to in-turn, keep investing into ethanol, wind & solar. Per their own generalized press releases

Read more at https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=v.ucu&postid=29693102#FfzqM6KYwZwYBrME.99