Please explain why none of these examples have led to any adoption of this technology? Let me take that one: because it defies logic and does not work to any level of efficacy.
Bringing up China...lol how absurd to suggest it ran for days and showed such promise but again they decided to scrap it! it’s blue brother, the one that knocked out all of RMOTC engineers with its brilliance, now sits out front of Qsep Hq as some strange monument to the millions of dollars flushed down the toilet. Remember folks if a major company “tests” your device even though they terminated an agreement to lease or buy it must mean the tech is sound and that it will be successful. Wow... I wonder why they just don’t skip testing altogether, after all the one-off neutron scattering test proved it so well they would never need to run another one. It’s not like Tao has ever fabricated results before. Just like when RAND reported that its fuel-saving devices were not up to snuff Qsep reported making all these new changes and licensing deals...they choose not to have RAND look at it again even though Tao said Elektra would increase mpg by 20 %. Obviously, this guy is not suited to be the scientific figure of a legit company...not if investors want to make money from a real emerging business.
As far as density is concerned and the argument that mass flow has no relationship to Qsep claims then apparently you don’t understand what the company says it’s device does. Oh yeah .. I get that they claim velocity by proxy must increase by reducing viscosity because they postulate batched crude suddenly transforms itself into a negative ER fluid which doesn’t exist in any real-world application today....and for the record this type of viscosity reduction happens with fluid that has been specifically doped like a semiconductor to align in a manner that provides a reduction of said fluid which again last only milliseconds
and would never provide the type of 100 hour viscosity reduction that is now being claimed and would not reduce any reliance on diluents especially with a pipeline moving a batched ever-changing viscous bulk. It does, however, provide a great source of comic relief!
