Home > Boards > Free Zone > User's Groups > The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Don’t Let Trump Mess With the Fed

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
BullNBear52 Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 114
Posts 187,059
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 12/16/02
160x600 placeholder
Costco 4Q Sales Rise
By Kimberly Chin
JPMorgan on Pace for Largest Percent Increase Since January -- Data Talk
Wheat Rises on Export Demand Indicators -- Daily Grain Highlights
Front Month Nymex Natural Gas Rose 3.56% to Settle at $4.9760 -- Data Talk
Front Month Nymex RBOB Gasoline Rose 2.24% to Settle at $2.1715 -- Data Talk
Top Company News of the Day
Charles Schwab On Pace for Largest Percent Increase Since January -- Data Talk
Walmart Closes Inaugural $2 Billion Green Bond Issuance
Salesforce Up Over 6%, on Track for New 52-Week Closing High -- Data Talk
Frito-Lay Using Compostable Packaging for Off The Eaten Path Brand
UnitedHealthcare to Offer Some Members Year-Long Access to Apple Fitness+
EURO STOXX 50 Index Ends 1.08% Higher at 4194.92 -- Data Talk
STOXX Europe 50 Index Ends 0.86% Higher at 3577.85 -- Data Talk
CAC 40 Index Ends 0.98% Higher at 6701.98 -- Data Talk
DAX Ends 0.88% Higher at 15643.97 -- Data Talk
FTSE 100 Index Ends 0.07% Lower at 7078.35 -- Data Talk
STOXX Europe 600 Index Ends 0.93% Higher at 467.50 -- Data Talk
Manufacturing Activity in Central U.S. Slowed in September -- Kansas City Fed
CNH Industrial Subsidiary to Offer Notes in Private Placement
Gas Crisis a Win for Centrica as Energy Investors See Deal Spree -- Financial News
BP Confirms Fuel-Supply Issues at UK Service Stations
U.S. Leading Economic Index Increased in August -- Conference Board
U.S. Economic Activity Slows in September Amid Delta, Supply-Shortages -- IHS Markit
VC Daily: Biotechs Seek New Skill Set From Scientists Entering Field
New Home Sales on Tap -- Data Week Ahead
Mortgage Rates Change Slightly, Freddie Mac Says
BP to Limit Fuel Deliveries Amid UK Drivers Shortage -ITV
BullNBear52 Member Level  Monday, 04/29/19 10:45:51 AM
Re: None
Post # of 1117 
Don’t Let Trump Mess With the Fed
Steady leadership at the Federal Reserve is keeping the economy on track.
By Steven Rattner
Mr. Rattner served as counselor to the Treasury secretary in the Obama administration.
April 29, 2019

Once again, the Federal Reserve has regrettably become a favorite whipping boy.

President Trump has been lobbying it to lower interest rates, even though the unemployment rate is 3.8 percent. Progressives are still complaining that the central bank didn’t do enough to stimulate the economy in the wake of the 2008 recession.

More worrisome, Mr. Trump has been attacking the Fed’s actions with more vitriol than any previous president in memory while proposing two highly partisan and unqualified nominees to join a distinguished board that has historically been free of any political agenda.

The policy critics on both sides are about as wrong as imaginable. And above all, we need to guard the independence of the central bank, the most important government institution that has not been divided by the deep partisanship so evident elsewhere.

In an era when even the Supreme Court divides routinely along ideological lines, the Fed still maintains an analytical and, as the former chairman Janet Yellen liked to say, data dependent approach to policymaking.

Sure, disagreements occur, and at times, one or two members of the committee that sets interest rates register a dissent. But contrast that general equanimity with the squabbling Supreme Court.

For that, credit goes to all recent presidents (including, in his first two years, Mr. Trump), who have appointed board members with strong economic and financial credentials and a shared commitment to analytical policymaking.

Now the president wants to change that.

Happily, the Senate has already made clear that Herman Cain — with little relevant experience and charges of sexual harassment swirling around him — would have been unlikely to survive confirmation. (Mr. Cain withdrew his name from consideration.) And Stephen Moore, with a raft of tax peccadilloes, would also have to explain past statements like “I’m not an expert on monetary policy.”

Mr. Trump and his aides base their call for the Fed to lower rates on quiescent inflation, a phenomenon that could well be either aberrational or a new normal. Put me down as generally skeptical of pronouncements of a new normal.

And having come of age as a young Times reporter covering economic policy during a period of rampant inflation, I’m particularly skeptical of declaring inflation dead and buried.

Regardless, few mainstream economists believe that the interest rate increases to date have impeded the recovery, nor would cutting them materially accelerate growth.

“The president is using the Fed as a scapegoat for his own economic policy mistakes,” Mark Zandi, the chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, told me. “The Fed’s actions last year have no bearing on long-term economic growth.”

Of course, the Fed doesn’t always get it right. (It famously missed the dangers of the credit bubble in 2007.) But neither do the rest of us, including the Trump officials who are now implicitly or explicitly criticizing the Fed.

In June 2005, as home prices began to soften in overbuilt markets, Lawrence Kudlow, now director of the National Economic Council, said that only “bubbleheads” believe that housing weakness would “bring down the consumer, the rest of the economy and the entire stock market.”

Then there was the open letter, penned by a distinguished group of economic thinkers in November 2010 when unemployment was still nearly 10 percent, decrying the Fed’s use of aggressive monetary tools to fight the effects of the huge downturn.

Among the signatories: Kevin Hassett, then at the American Enterprise Institute. Mr. Hassett is now chairman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers but to his credit, has refrained from participating in the latest round of Fed bashing.

Sign Up for The Privacy Project Newsletter
As technology advances, will it continue to blur the lines between public and private? Explore what's at stake and what you can do about it.

Progressives have a different view of Fed policy over the past decade: Remarkably, they argue that the Fed was insufficiently aggressive in fighting the 2008 downturn.

Too timid? Really? In unprecedented actions, the Fed kept interest rates close to zero for seven years and engaged in an aggressive bond buying program known as quantitative easing.

That program, which prompted the enraged letter from conservatives when the Fed’s balance sheet totaled $2.3 trillion, ultimately reached $4.5 trillion. And after the economic data started to wobble late last year, the Fed announced that it would taper the reduction of its holdings.

What progressives don’t understand is that while it is immensely powerful, the Fed can’t solve all our economic problems. For example, weak productivity growth and raging income inequality need to be addressed through legislative action: better tax policy, increased spending on infrastructure and the like.

Meanwhile, as with so many other matters, Mr. Trump’s saber rattling has unnerved international allies. A week ago, the European Central Bank’s president, Mario Draghi, said that he was “certainly worried about central bank independence,” especially “in the most important jurisdiction in the world.”

We should all be worried. And most important, Mr. Trump should keep his hands off the Fed.


Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
Current Price
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences