Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[twaflyer1]

gers. In order to receive damages, if some of that 50 Mil' includes damages, the charge has to be a clear-cut effort to fraud someone! If there are any facts that dispute that, those Damages will never be allowed?

While is seems on the surface that Fraud or criminal actions took place, we all know the Lawyers on the defendants' sides will either claim ignorance, confusion, Misidentification of Gers' rights, just an error on the part of the sales people in charge, or that the patents are invalid for whatever reason? Now we all know that most Ceo's are not aware of all the Laws and rules, and might claim Ignorance, but ignorance is not a valid reason as each company must make certain they are not infringing on someone else's property, especially when they have been in Business for quite a while, where Contracting in a Licensee agreement is a pretty common event in the History of most Companies, and undoubtedly had some experience in that regard or knew of others who underwent Lawsuits!