Thursday, April 18, 2019 7:49:49 AM
SOX violation "DISMISSED". From the filing:
:,'I therefor dismiss this as to Anderson and find no Section 105(c)(7)(BJ'violations by Carnahan or CYIOS.".
And this from the filing: SEC Atty:
"In a telephone conference call Tuesday, March 17, 2015 @1100, Chris Davis stated "I would not have a case if it was not for the alleged Sarbane-Oxley violation."
Again, just a FYI. Anyone interested needs to read the entire filing. IMHO, we are back to 50-50 chance of dismissal. HAWK
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-16386-event-113.pdf
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM