it seems like there is some differentiation else why not define "Junior Stakeholders" as "unsecured creditors"?
could junior stakeholders be construed as stockholders? just don't know but i find it interesting this was drafted in a manner which seems somewhat open ended.
they could just as easily have said "good-faith compromises that further protect the interests of the unsecured creditors as junior stakeholders in these proceedings.
maybe i'm just engaging in unnecessary wordsmithing.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.